What is the definition of Exodus 21:20? ๐ ๐
And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his hand; he shall be surely punished.
Explanation:
Okay, letโs break down that verse from Exodus 21:20. Itโs a pretty serious one about the relationship between God and His people โ specifically, how He deals with those who serve Him.
Here's what it means in simpler terms:
The Basic Idea:
God is very firm about protecting His servants. If a servant (or maid) disrespects or harms their master (or mistress) ๐with the force of a rod๐, God will punish them severely.
Letโs unpack it piece by piece:
๐
"And if a man smite his servant, or his maid, with a rod, and he die under his handโฆ"
This is the key part. It describes a specific action โ a physical act of violence โ that's considered a serious offense.
๐
โโฆhe shall be surely punished.โ
This means God will take action against this person. The punishment isnโt just a warning; itโs a definite consequence.
What does "surely" mean?
The word โsurelyโ is really important here. It's not just ๐maybe๐ they'll be punished. It means the punishment will happen ๐immediately๐. Itโs a very strong guarantee from God.
Context and Why it Matters:
This verse comes from a story in Genesis about Jacob (a man in ancient Israel) and his master, Isaac. Jacob was angry with Isaac because he didn't give him a fair share of the family inheritance. In response, Jacob harshly treated Isaacโs servant. God saw this as an unacceptable act and responded by setting this law โ this verse โ to protect the servants.
Important Note:
This passage is often interpreted as a warning against abuse and disrespect towards those who are in a position of service to God. It emphasizes that obedience, respect, and fairness are crucial for maintaining a good relationship with God.
In short, the verse says that if someone treats their servant or maid badly with force, they will face a serious punishment.
---
Do you want me to:
๐ Explain another verse?
๐ Discuss the meaning of this verse in more detail?
๐ Provide a historical context for this passage?